One of the most glaring issues in marketing for institutional sexual assault litigations is the use of poorly chosen, insensitive imagery.
Many ads rely on low-quality stock images that depict survivors as either severely injured victims or placed in distressing situations that can easily retrigger trauma.
These images often perpetuate a narrative of helplessness and victimization, or even downplay the abuse in order to get more basic messages about “compensation” across.
This approach not only fails to engage survivors respectfully but also underscores a lack of understanding of the complexity of trauma.
The messaging within these campaigns often exacerbates the issue, with overly simplistic or tone-deaf approaches focusing on topics like compensation or trauma in a way that feels exploitative.
The emphasis on shock value in many digital ads can generate high levels of engagement, but this is based on emotional triggers rather than thoughtful outreach.
Using shock as a primary metric for success is entirely counterproductive in these serious cases—it fails to honor the gravity of survivors’ experiences, instead reducing their pain to an attention-grabbing tactic.
It’s critical for law firms to work closely with marketers to ensure that both imagery and messaging are trauma-informed and respectful.
Law firms should be fully aware of the content being used to represent their brand, making sure that the images survivors see before interacting with their legal services are not retraumatizing.
Collaboration ensures that survivors feel empowered to seek help without feeling exploited or disrespected.
Marketing campaigns that rely on insensitive visuals and messaging do a disservice not only to survivors but also to the law firms involved, creating a harmful disconnect between survivors and the legal support they need.